<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>News :: News and Policy.com</title>
      <link>http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/</link>
      <description>Newsandpolicy.com is a breaking story portal and weblog dedicated to publishing the most politically and culturally relevant stories as they are reported by the media in the United States and worldwide.</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 07:10:15 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>New York magnate leaves billions to the dogs</title>
         <description>NEW YORK (Reuters) - New York hotelier and real estate magnate Leona Helmsley left millions to her beloved dog, Trouble, but she has left billions for the care of dogs in general, The New York Times said on Tuesday.

Helmsley left instructions that an entire charitable trust valued at $5 billion to $8 billion (2.5 billion to 4 billion pounds) and amounting to virtually all of her estate, be used for the care and welfare of dogs, the newspaper said, citing two people who had seen the document and described it on condition of anonymity.

The two people who had seen the document said Helmsley signed it in 2003 to establish goals for the trust that would disburse assets after her death. The first goal was to help indigent people and the second to provide for the care and welfare of dogs, the newspaper said. But a year later, she deleted the first goal.

But all the money may not go to the dogs, the article said. It said the mission statement also has a provision that Helmsley&apos;s trustees may use their discretion in distributing the funds, and some lawyers say the statement may not mean much, given that it was not incorporated into her will or the trust documents.

Helmsley, who was known as &quot;the Queen of Mean&quot; because of the way she dealt with her employees, had a soft spot for her dog. But a New York court last month lowered the dog&apos;s inheritance to $2 million from $12 million on grounds that Helmsley was mentally unfit when she made her will.

A spokesman for the executors of Helmsley&apos;s estate told the Times they did not want to comment on the statement because they were still working to determine the trust&apos;s direction.

Helmsley died in August 2007 at age 87. She amassed a fortune in real estate and hotels with her husband, Harry Helmsley, who died in 1997.

Famously quoted as having said &quot;only the little people pay taxes,&quot; Helmsley spent 18 months in federal prison for evading $1.7 million in taxes in 1989.

(Writing by Patricia Zengerle; Editing by Eric Walsh)
</description>
         <link>http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2008/07/new-york-magnate-leaves-billions-to-the-dogs.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2008/07/new-york-magnate-leaves-billions-to-the-dogs.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Fade in / Fade out</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category"><![CDATA[Law &amp; Crime]]></category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Most Popular</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Today&apos;s Top News</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">World News</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 07:10:15 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>RNC to run its first ad of presidential campaign</title>
         <description>WASHINGTON (AP) - An independent arm of the Republican National Committee plans to spend $3 million on an ad campaign contrasting GOP presidential candidate John McCain to Democrat Barack Obama on energy security.

The ad will run in Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin beginning Sunday. The ad represents the first of the RNC&apos;s independent expenditure operation.

The effort will be run by Republican media consultant Brad Todd of On Message Inc., a media and polling firm that worked on Mitt Romney&apos;s presidential campaign.

Todd said the ad will focus on energy, &quot;which is emerging as a defining difference in the race for president.&quot;

By setting up a separate organization within the RNC, the national party can spend unlimited resources on behalf of McCain as long as it does not coordinate with the candidate&apos;s campaign.

McCain and the RNC have been raising money together for a joint victory fund that can that can be used to coordinate efforts between the national party and the McCain campaign. But the RNC is limited to spending no more than $19.1 million on coordinated activities.

The independent operation faces no such restriction, but can have no connection to the rest of the RNC or the McCain campaign. McCain has decided to accept public financing in the general election, which limits him to about $84 million in spending, a step that makes reliance on the national party even more important. Obama, who has shattered fundraising records, has decided to bypass the public money and raise his own instead.

&quot;Following Barack Obama&apos;s decision to become the only major party presidential candidate in history to not adhere to campaign spending caps, the Republican National Committee has begun an independent expenditure campaign in accordance with FEC regulations,&quot; Todd said in a statement Wednesday.

The Democratic National Committee first aired ads critical of McCain in the spring.

McCain and Obama have been running their own general election ads. Obama has focused on reintroducing himself to voters through biographical ads that are airing in 18 states. McCain ran one ad that featured his family&apos;s military service and highlighted his five years as a prisoner of war in Vietnam; he is now on the air in 11 states with an ad promoting his stance to control global warming.

The RNC&apos;s first salvo of the election comes as several outside groups take advantage of a lull in summer election activity to begin defining and prodding presidential and congressional candidates with their own multimillion-dollar advocacy campaigns.

Health care, gun rights and financial security will be among the dominant issues as unions and special interest organizations try to set the tone for the general election campaign and beyond.

Among the top efforts under way:

- The AARP began airing a new ad on national cable Wednesday pressing Obama and McCain to keep talking about financial security for retirees and affordable health care. Beginning Monday, the ad will run in Orlando and Tampa, Fla.; Des Moines, Iowa; Manchester, N.H., and Detroit - markets in key battleground states. The seniors&apos; advocacy group, acting on behalf of a coalition called Divided We Fail, plans to spend more than $20 million on its bipartisan ad campaign through Labor Day.

- A coalition of labor and liberal organizations next week plans to launch a $40 million campaign in key congressional districts to promote affordable health care coverage for all Americans. The group expects to spend $25 million in commercials in 45 states between now and Election Day in November. Its members include unions such as the Service Employees International Union, the AFL-CIO, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees and Democratic-leaning organizations such as the Center for American Progress, MoveOn.org, and the Campaign for America&apos;s Future.

- The National Rifle Association plans to spend about $40 million to influence the presidential election, starting with a voter registration effort this summer and eventually moving to an ad campaign during the fall. The NRA has not yet endorsed a presidential candidate, but plans to air ads criticizing Obama&apos;s past support for restrictions on access to guns. The NRA also has had a tense relationship with Republican John McCain over his work on campaign finance laws that the NRA has opposed, concerned about the limits imposed on free speech.</description>
         <link>http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2008/07/rnc-to-run-its-first-ad-of-presidential-campaign.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2008/07/rnc-to-run-its-first-ad-of-presidential-campaign.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">2008 Election Newstracker...</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Breaking Story Highlights</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">The Polls... Republicans vs Democrats</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Today&apos;s Top News</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 07:03:14 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Economy sheds jobs for 6th month</title>
         <description>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. employers cut workers from their payrolls for the sixth straight month in June for the longest losing employment streak since 2002, government data on Thursday showed.

A separate report showed new applications for jobless benefits hurdling to 404,000, suggesting further weakness ahead for employment.

U.S. stock futures rallied on the news, while prices on U.S. government debt retreated as investors shifted their attention toward the equities market.

&quot;It shows that the labor market still is very soft. We&apos;re not seeing dramatic job cuts, but clearly companies are trying to hold the line on costs,&quot; said Gary Thayer, senior economist at Wachovia Securities in St. Louis.

The Labor Department said the unemployment rate held steady at 5.5 percent in June and 62,000 jobs were lost from nonfarm payrolls, bringing jobs shed for the year so far to 438,000 as housing market woes chilled growth.

Analysts polled by Reuters had expected the unemployment rate to edge down to 5.4 percent. Payrolls were forecast to shed 60,000 jobs in June versus a 62,000 loss in May.

Both May and April&apos;s count were revised lower, taking their combined job losses to 129,000, compared to an early estimate of 77,000 jobs lost.

TAME WAGES

Average hourly earnings, closely watched by the Federal Reserve as it monitors price pressures to make sure they do not creep into higher wages, edged up six cents, or 0.3 percent in June to $18.01.

This took the year-on-year gain in average hourly earnings to 3.4 percent, the lowest reading since January 2006.

The Fed last week halted an aggressive interest rate cutting campaign, holding rates at 2 percent and warning that inflation risks had risen amid soaring energy and food prices. The central bank had been cutting rates to shield growth from a collapsing housing market.

&quot;It does show that the Fed has to hold policy steady for now. We&apos;ve now seen job cuts all year long and that suggests that raising interest rates now would probably hurt the economy significantly,&quot; said Thayer.

June&apos;s decline was also the longest consecutive monthly shrinkage in payrolls since the collapse of the technology stock bubble, when they fell from March 2001 until May 2002 without respite as the economy went through a mild recession.

There were 43,00 job losses in construction in June as the housing slowdown continued to bite, while manufacturing shed 33,000 jobs. Both of these sectors have lost jobs in every month over the past year.

Providers of professional services lost 51,000 jobs as the financial services and real estate industries continued to suffer the country&apos;s housing market woes.

Flooding in the Midwest had no impact on June&apos;s national employment report, the Labor Department said, holding out the possibility of additional pressure on the jobs market in the coming months as flood-related job losses get counted.

A separate report from the labor department showed that U.S. workers filing new claims for jobless benefits jumped 16,000 last week to 404,000.

The four-week average of new jobless claims, a better gauge of underlying labor trends because it irons out week-to-week volatility, increased for the fourth straight week to 390,500, the highest reading since October 2005 in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.

(Reporting by Alister Bull, editing by Joanne Morrison)</description>
         <link>http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2008/07/economy-sheds-jobs-for-6th-month.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2008/07/economy-sheds-jobs-for-6th-month.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Business</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Most Popular</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Today&apos;s Top News</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">World News</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 06:53:20 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Conservative evangelicals discuss backing McCain</title>
         <description>Conservative evangelical leaders met privately this week to discuss putting aside their misgivings about John McCain and coalescing around the Republican&apos;s presidential bid while urging him to consider social conservative favorite Mike Huckabee as a running mate.

About 90 of the movement&apos;s leading activists gathered Tuesday night in Denver for a meeting convened by Mathew Staver, who heads the Florida-based legal advocacy group Liberty Counsel.

Many evangelical leaders backed other GOP candidates early on and remain wary of McCain&apos;s commitment to their causes and his previous criticisms of movement leaders. But with the presidential field now set, many evangelical leaders are taking a more pragmatic view, realizing also that the Democratic candidate, Barack Obama, is making a strong play for evangelical voters and talking freely about his faith.

&quot;Our shared core values compel us to unite and choose the presidential candidate that best advances those values,&quot; said Staver, who previously backed Huckabee&apos;s bid. &quot;That obvious choice is Sen. John McCain. I think people left the meeting in unity the likes of which have not been evident through the primaries.&quot;

The group also agreed to sign a letter urging the McCain campaign to consider Huckabee, a former Arkansas governor and Southern Baptist minister, as his vice presidential choice, said another participant, Phil Burress. Burress, who heads an Ohio group that helped pass an anti-gay marriage measure in that state in 2004, was among a group of conservative Christian leaders who met with McCain last week.

Burress characterized the Huckabee overture as a &quot;suggestion, not a demand.&quot;

&quot;This is a man you don&apos;t threaten,&quot; Burress said of McCain. &quot;His principles are his principles. The last thing you want to do is try to force him to do something he doesn&apos;t want to do because he&apos;d probably do the opposite.&quot;

Burress said that while Huckabee is a favorite of Christian conservatives, the most important thing is that McCain&apos;s running mate be &quot;pro-life and pro-family.&quot; Huckabee isn&apos;t a favorite of all evangelical leaders, either; some dislike his populist message, emphasis on the environment and economic positions.

The leaders meeting in Denver included Phyllis Schlafly, head of the Eagle Forum; &quot;Left Behind&quot; co-author Tim LaHaye and his wife, Beverly, founder of Concerned Women for America; David Barton, founder of WallBuilders; Rick Scarborough of Vision America; and Don Hodel, a former interior secretary and former president of Colorado Springs-based Focus on the Family, according to Staver.

James Dobson, the founder of Focus on the Family and a fan of neither McCain nor Obama, did not attend. Dobson has been in California working on a new book, aides have said.

Time magazine first reported on the meeting on its Web site Wednesday.

Staver said the result will be more leaders &quot;energizing their base&quot; and targeted efforts in battleground states and states with anti-gay marriage ballot initiatives this fall such as Florida and California.

&quot;Obama is a considerable threat to our values,&quot; Staver said. &quot;At the same time, Sen. McCain recently has been reaching out to evangelicals and conservative voters that we represent.&quot;

Even so, Burress said that at this point, conservative Christians are motivated more out of opposition to Obama than enthusiasm for McCain.

&quot;People are not saying, &apos;Let&apos;s all go out and support John McCain,&apos;&quot; Burress said. &quot;It&apos;s more like, &apos;We have to do what we have to do for our country.&apos; Basically, that boiled down to John McCain.&quot;

Although McCain opposes abortion rights, his support for embryonic stem cell research and opposition to a federal amendment prohibiting gay marriage clashes with the widely held social conservative view.

Obama this week called for expanding White House efforts to steer social service dollars to religious groups, and he has developed campaign events targeting religious voters. But the Democrat&apos;s support for abortion rights and gay rights calls into question how many evangelical votes he can win.

&quot;The only evangelicals that will support Obama are the ones who haven&apos;t read their Bible,&quot; Burress said. &quot;The more and more we learn about Obama, the closer and closer we get to McCain.&quot;

&quot;We have agreed,&quot; he said, &quot;that we&apos;ll be working hard the next few months.&quot;

(This version CORRECTS a word in quote to &apos;few months,&apos; not &apos;two months.&apos;) </description>
         <link>http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2008/07/conservative-evangelicals-discuss-backing-mccain.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2008/07/conservative-evangelicals-discuss-backing-mccain.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Breaking Story Highlights</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Faith and State</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Most Popular</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Politics</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Today&apos;s Top News</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 06:47:39 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The &apos;mushy middle&apos; hard to reach for Obama, McCain</title>
         <description>WASHINGTON (AP) - They&apos;re the most fickle voters, and potentially the most powerful. Thus, with party nominations secure, John McCain and Barack Obama now are pushing toward the center to win them over.

Meet the &quot;mushy middle,&quot; a complex chunk of people likely to decide the presidential election but difficult to reach and hard to please.

&quot;Yes, we can!&quot; isn&apos;t floating their boat. Nothing much is, from either candidate.

They aren&apos;t uniformly conservative or liberal, and they don&apos;t fit strict Republican or Democratic orthodoxy. They aren&apos;t typically engaged in politics, and they don&apos;t much care about the campaign. And like so many others, they are extraordinarily pessimistic.

&quot;To me, it&apos;s not about the party, it&apos;s about who is the best person for the job,&quot; says Pam Robinett, 47, from Wellington, Kan., who always votes. Then again, &quot;they&apos;ll all lie, cheat and steal to get what they want.&quot;

Talk about a tough sell.

&quot;The country&apos;s going to go to hell in a handbasket with this election,&quot; seethes James Nauman, 55, from Lutz, Fla. &quot;I don&apos;t think Obama&apos;s qualified and McCain&apos;s another Bush. Neither of them really have impressed me.&quot;

Both will try.

A recent AP-Yahoo News poll finds that 15 percent call themselves moderates and aren&apos;t solidly supporting a candidate. More than half of this still-persuadable middle is made up of independents.

&quot;The center always matters,&quot; said Andrew Kohut, director of the Pew Research Center. &quot;It matters more this year. Both candidates were nominated because they appealed to independents and moderates, so how these voters make a choice between Obama and McCain will be even more decisive.&quot;

---

For now, at least, the race is competitive and the rivals&apos; bases are mostly intact.

The survey, conducted by Knowledge Networks, found that three in four Republicans and three in four conservatives are backing McCain, while Obama has nearly identical support among Democrats and liberals.

So, both are tacking away from their party&apos;s ideological ends to appeal to this unpredictable swath in between.

McCain is moving away from the unpopular President Bush if not from the Republican Party itself. He emphasizes bipartisanship while pressing two issues that resonate strongly with voters of all stripes.

He &quot;stood up to the president and sounded the alarm on global warming,&quot; one McCain commercial says. Another promotes a &quot;bipartisan plan to lower prices at the pump, reduce dependence on foreign oil through domestic drilling and champion energy alternatives.&quot;

Obama, for his part, broke from the left by backing new rules for the government&apos;s terrorist eavesdropping program, straddling a Supreme Court ruling striking down a gun ban and objecting to the justices&apos; decision outlawing executions of child rapists. He even quoted conservative hero Ronald Reagan&apos;s &quot;trust but verify&quot; line in reacting to North Korea&apos;s latest agreement on nuclear weapons.

His leadoff campaign commercial cast him as the embodiment of the center and pitched family values, patriotism, &quot;welfare to work&quot; and lower taxes. It stressed &quot;love of country&quot; and &quot;working hard without making excuses&quot; - echoes of Bill Clinton.

McCain naturally may be better positioned to capture more of the middle; he came out of the GOP&apos;s center to dispatch liberal Rudy Giuliani on his left and conservative Mitt Romney and Christian evangelical Mike Huckabee on his right. Obama emerged from the party&apos;s left to topple the more centrist Hillary Rodham Clinton.

However, Obama and McCain both won their nominations with the support of independents, moderates and crossovers from the opposite party.

Some 39 percent of voters called themselves Democratic, 29 percent Republican, and 32 percent independent in the June 13-23 survey, part of an ongoing study tracking opinions of the same group of people over the election cycle. The overall margin of sampling error was plus or minus 2.3 percentage points.

That Democratic edge suggests Obama may be less dependent on votes in the middle than McCain.

Still, the likeliest path to the White House cuts through the center of the electorate.

&quot;They&apos;re the kingmakers in American politics,&quot; said Matt Bennett, a Democratic operative at the centrist Third Way policy group. &quot;They&apos;re the people who decide elections.&quot;

---

Who exactly are these power-wielding voters?

They look much like the general population. They reflect the same frustration with the status quo. A significant majority has a low opinion of Bush and Congress. They have more favorable impressions of Democrats than Republicans. Many are feeling the economic pinch. They want troops to return from Iraq as soon as possible.

Like the broad electorate, they rank gas prices and the economy as their top concerns, followed by health care, Social Security, taxes and education. Terrorism and Iraq are lower.

But there are important differences.

Compared with far-right and far-left voters, this group tends to be more Hispanic, more Catholic than the left and more secular than the right. They are more likely to be married with children and live in far-flung suburbs or rural areas. They also tend to be less educated.

They are not nearly as motivated as those who identify with political parties or ideologies. Fewer are registered to vote.

&quot;These are the most disengaged voters,&quot; said Ron Shaiko, a public policy specialist at Dartmouth College. &quot;There&apos;s a point at which they&apos;re going to engage, and it&apos;s not clear who will win when they do.&quot;

Nearly half view McCain favorably, while slightly more than a third see Obama positively. Still, the candidates are little-known to a quarter, and many have little enthusiasm for either.

&quot;I like McCain more because I&apos;m concerned about Obama. I question his judgments,&quot; says Tony Miller, 39 and a left-leaning moderate from Springfield, Ill. Conversely, Susan Carroll, 43, a moderate Democrat from Garrettsville, Ohio, says Obama&apos;s &quot;the better choice&quot; because &quot;I honestly think that McCain is anti-woman.&quot;

This voting group&apos;s views cross some of the usual lines.

For instance, they overwhelmingly favor abortion rights and legal rights for same-sex couples, typically Democratic and liberal positions. But they also overwhelmingly say cutting taxes should be a high priority, typically a Republican and conservative refrain.

These voters say they are far less interested in cultural issues and far more interested in bread-and-butter subjects like health care and Social Security.

&quot;All are a few points from the ideological center of the country, and they tend to be fiscally conservative and socially tolerant,&quot; said Greg Strimple, a Republican pollster in New York.

---

Take Jan Thomas.

&quot;I&apos;m liberal in some areas and I&apos;m conservative in others,&quot; says the undecided moderate from Stevensville, Mont., who is 69 and shuns party labels.

Unlike the GOP, she supports abortion rights and declares &quot;to each his own&quot; on gay marriage. Splitting from the Democrats, she objects to &quot;big government,&quot; costly entitlement programs that &quot;lead to dependency&quot; and universal health care proposals &quot;that mean higher taxes.&quot;

She&apos;s unsettled about both candidates.

Obama&apos;s &quot;inexperience and his voting record on gun control&quot; bug her; she owns two handguns, a shotgun and a rifle and is still &quot;a pretty good shot.&quot; She doesn&apos;t like McCain&apos;s &quot;vacillating&quot; or stances on the environment and comprehensive immigration reform. &quot;I do not believe in global warming,&quot; she says. And &quot;we&apos;ve got to secure our borders.&quot;

David Donovan, 31, a GOP-leaning independent from Crystal River, Fla., also is &quot;not exactly thrilled with either of them.&quot;

McCain on foreign policy &quot;just doesn&apos;t make a lot of sense,&quot; but Obama&apos;s &quot;abundance of gun control&quot; irks this gun owner, as does the Democrats&apos; education platform. And, he says, &quot;I think taxes suck.&quot;

Not that he has time to follow the campaign closely; Donovan travels 150 miles roundtrip to build bridges for 14 hours a day. The commute costs his one-income household $50 in tolls and $220 in fuel each week. He and his wife haven&apos;t had health care coverage for two years. She&apos;s on disability after seven mild strokes. Her student loan debt is growing.

&quot;There are some days where I&apos;d vote for Mickey Mouse for president,&quot; Donovan said. &quot;It&apos;s got to be better than this.&quot;

---

Associated Press Director of Surveys Trevor Tompson and AP News Survey Specialist Dennis Junius contributed to this report. </description>
         <link>http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2008/07/the-mushy-middle-hard-to-reach-for-obama-mccain.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2008/07/the-mushy-middle-hard-to-reach-for-obama-mccain.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Breaking Story</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">McCain Watch</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Politics</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Today&apos;s Top News</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 06:43:41 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>McCain veep helper is discreet lawyer</title>
         <description>WASHINGTON (AP) - The choice for John McCain&apos;s running mate is such a mystery that few people even know who is helping in that search.

The Republican is leaning on a consummate behind-the-scenes player in Washington - attorney Arthur B. Culvahouse Jr. - for this maximum-discretion, minimal-disclosure assignment. In Culvahouse, a one-time White House counsel to President Reagan, McCain gets someone whose work mostly has been so obscure that he likely isn&apos;t recognized outside Washington&apos;s Beltway.

Culvahouse has been involved in vetting people for positions at all levels of government for three decades, roles he&apos;s gotten partly because of his reputation for under-the-radar maneuvering.

McCain has turned to him in recent weeks as he sorts through a list of some 20 or more would-be No. 2s - not that you&apos;d know it. The Arizona senator, like every nominee-in-waiting, is demanding privacy and trying to keep the search under wraps, including the involvement of the man who goes by A.B.

McCain&apos;s advisers, the few in the know, are under strict orders not to even discuss the search. McCain, at times, has violated his own rule, including mentioning he wanted to consult with Culvahouse and disclosing he had a preliminary names list.

When word leaked that three potentials - former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal and Florida Gov. Charlie Crist - were invited to McCain&apos;s estate Arizona for Memorial Day weekend, aides were furious and insisted it was a social affair.

Democrat Barack Obama, too, has advocated a private process but, so far, it&apos;s been fairly public. Obama, for example, announced that a former Hillary Rodham Clinton campaign manager would be chief of staff to his yet-to-be-chosen running mate.

Obama also named his search committee shortly after clinching the nomination - Jim Johnson, the former chairman of Fannie Mae (FNM), Eric Holder, a former deputy attorney general, and Caroline Kennedy. Within days, the committee went to Capitol Hill to consult with Democrats, including Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

Under fire from Republicans and McCain, Johnson abruptly resigned after The Wall Street Journal reported he got home mortgages with help from the CEO of Countrywide Financial Corp. (CFC) Holder, too, has faced a barrage of GOP attacks; he was the former Justice Department official who vetted President Clinton&apos;s oft-criticized 2001 pardon of financier Marc Rich.

The third member of Obama&apos;s team has a larger-than-life name as the daughter of former President Kennedy.

Conversely, Culvahouse&apos;s role in McCain&apos;s search has been largely shrouded in secrecy.

McCain aides won&apos;t confirm his position, but it&apos;s an open secret in GOP circles that while McCain and campaign manager Rick Davis are running the show, Culvahouse is closely involved the process.

&quot;From my understanding, he has been asked to take a look at the potential candidates for vice president, look at their background,&quot; said former Sen. Howard Baker of Tennessee, for whom Culvahouse was a top aide in the 1970s.

Baker called Culvahouse the perfect choice for such an assignment, saying: &quot;He&apos;s smart. He&apos;s discreet. He doesn&apos;t seek out the press and a forum. He knows the system here in town; he&apos;s worked in it and understand it. He has no discernible ax to grind, and those things together make him enormously qualified and capable.&quot;

And, Baker said, he&apos;s not prone to leaking names: &quot;You ain&apos;t going to get it from him, and that&apos;s one of his endearing qualities.&quot;

Aside from working for Baker, Culvahouse&apos;s other high-profile political post was as Reagan&apos;s counsel for nearly two years in the 1980s. During that time, Culvahouse vetted an estimated 200 nominees for various positions, including Robert Bork and Anthony Kennedy for the Supreme Court and Alan Greenspan for Federal Reserve chairman. He also advised the president on a range of matters, including the Iran-Contra investigations.

These days, Culvahouse, 59, is the chairman of O&apos;Melveny &amp; Myers, an international law firm where he has worked since 1976, save for a few years in the 1980s. His biography posted on his firm&apos;s Web site says he also has an &quot;active corporate governance, internal investigations and compliance, and strategic counseling practice.&quot; Among his clients: the International Olympic Committee in the scandal surrounding the Salt Lake City games and Ford Motor Co. (F) in the Firestone tire investigations.

Lobbying is not listed as part of his role, and Republicans familiar with his work say that he isn&apos;t a lobbyist by trade and does not have a lobbying practice. Senate records show he was registered to lobby on behalf of Fannie Mae and Lockheed Martin in a couple of instances several years ago but his allies say those were rare occasions and he hasn&apos;t done any work requiring him to register with the Senate in five years. They call it &quot;a stretch&quot; to describe Culvahouse as a lobbyist, a description Democrats use for him.

Obama spokesman Bill Burton has called it &quot;the height of hypocrisy&quot; for McCain to choose someone to help him who had been registered to lobby for government-sponsored mortgage lender Fannie Mae, where Johnson was CEO, and whose firm&apos;s clients have included ExxonMobil Corp. and former Enron Corp. CEO Jeffrey Skilling.

A George W. Bush donor in 2000 and 2004, Culvahouse was in McCain&apos;s camp during the 2008 primary.

&quot;John McCain is the only candidate who can rally the Reagan coalition of conservatives, independents and conservative Democrats needed to defeat the Democratic nominee,&quot; Culvahouse told The Washington Times in January. He praised McCain as like Reagan, saying that McCain is &quot;motivated by obligation&quot; and &quot;sees government service as an honor and a privilege.&quot;

</description>
         <link>http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2008/06/mccain-veep-helper-is-discreet-lawyer.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2008/06/mccain-veep-helper-is-discreet-lawyer.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">McCain Watch</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Politics</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Today&apos;s Top News</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 06:22:54 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>McCain adviser apologizes for September 11 comment</title>
         <description>FRESNO, California (Reuters) - A top adviser to Republican presidential candidate John McCain apologized on Monday after he was quoted as saying a September 11-type attack before the November election would benefit McCain.

The campaign of Democrat Barack Obama condemned the remark by McCain political adviser Charlie Black, calling it a &quot;complete disgrace.&quot;

&quot;I deeply regret the comments, they were inappropriate,&quot; Black said in a statement after McCain said that if Black had made such a comment, &quot;I strenuously disagree&quot; with it.

&quot;I recognize that John McCain has devoted his entire adult life to protecting his country and placing its security before every other consideration,&quot; said Black, one of McCain&apos;s most trusted political advisers.

Fortune magazine said Black, in discussing how national security was McCain&apos;s strong suit, had said when asked about another terrorist attack on U.S. soil that &quot;certainly it would be a big advantage to him.&quot;

Black&apos;s comment to Fortune was a distraction for McCain as he seeks to catch up to Obama in the polls, where Obama leads by about 6 percentage points.

&quot;The fact that John McCain&apos;s top adviser says that a terrorist attack on American soil would be a &apos;big advantage&apos; for their political campaign is a complete disgrace, and is exactly the kind of politics that needs to change,&quot; Obama spokesman Bill Burton said.

Massachusetts Democratic Sen. John Kerry, who lost to President George W. Bush in the 2004 election based largely on who would make the country safer, said Black&apos;s comment smacked of &quot;the worst of the Rove-Bush fear playbook,&quot; a reference to Bush&apos;s former political adviser, Karl Rove.

A McCain campaign official said Black did not remember making the particular comment to Fortune but did not dispute the characterization.

The official said Black was speaking in the context that any day on the campaign trail that the theme was national security, was a good day for McCain.

McCain, asked about the magazine article at a news conference, distanced himself from the comment.

&quot;I cannot imagine why he would say it. It&apos;s not true,&quot; McCain said, adding he had worked hard since the September 11 attack to prevent another such attack. (Additional reporting by Deborah Charles and Caren Bohan; Editing by Peter Cooney)</description>
         <link>http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2008/06/mccain-adviser-apologizes-for-september-11-comment.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2008/06/mccain-adviser-apologizes-for-september-11-comment.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">2008 Election Newstracker...</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">McCain Watch</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Politics</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Terror Watch</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Today&apos;s Top News</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">World News</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 06:08:27 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Iran says EU sanctions could hurt nuclear diplomacy</title>
         <description>TEHRAN (Reuters) - Iran said on Tuesday new sanctions imposed on it by the European Union over its nuclear plans could hurt diplomatic efforts to resolve the row.

The standoff between the West and the Islamic state has sparked fears of a military confrontation that would disrupt oil supplies. Last week a report said Israel had practiced for a possible strike against Iran&apos;s nuclear sites.

But a senior Iranian official denied on Tuesday the rumors of an Israeli attack on his country, which sent stocks lower and oil prices higher.

&quot;No attack against Iran&apos;s nuclear facilities has taken place,&quot; the official said. In Jerusalem, an Israeli army spokesman said: &quot;We are not aware of any such incident in Iran.&quot;

Israel, widely believed to have the Middle East&apos;s only atomic arsenal, has described Iran&apos;s nuclear program as a threat to its existence.

Western powers suspect Iran, the world&apos;s fourth-largest oil exporter, wants to make nuclear arms but Tehran denies this.

On Monday, the 27-nation EU agreed new punitive measures targeting businesses and individuals the West says are linked to Iran&apos;s nuclear and ballistic program.

The latest sanctions include an asset freeze on Iran&apos;s largest state bank, Bank Melli, and visa bans on senior officials including Defense Minister Mostafa Mohammad Najjar and Gholamreza Aghazadeh, head of Iran&apos;s Atomic Energy Organization.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Mohammad Ali Hosseini condemned the move by the EU, still an important economic partner for Tehran even if trade volumes have declined, as &quot;illegal&quot; and made clear it would not slow Iran&apos;s nuclear activities.

OIL WINDFALL

Hosseini said the sanctions would strengthen the determination of Iranians &quot;to establish their obvious rights and will not help to create an appropriate atmosphere to resolve the issue through diplomatic channels&quot;.

He was referring to separate proposals put forward by Iran and by six world powers intended to defuse the dispute that has helped push up oil prices to record highs.

EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana handed Iran an offer on June 14 of economic and other benefits proposed by the United States, Russia, China, Britain, Germany and France to try to convince it to halt uranium enrichment.

Iranian officials have repeatedly ruled out suspending enrichment, which can have both civilian and military uses.

Their refusal to do so has drawn three rounds of limited U.N. sanctions since 2006 and Western powers have warned of more such measures if Iran rejects the latest offer.

Iran has put forward its own package of proposals aimed at resolving the row, but diplomats say it ignores global concern about its enrichment program.

Analysts say Western companies are becoming more wary of investing in Iran even though its windfall crude export earnings, which its oil minister estimates at $6 billion per month, are helping it to cushion the sanctions impact.

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, widely expected to stand for re-election in 2009, is also under increased political pressure at home for failing to rein in annual inflation of 25 percent.

The United States, which has also imposed sanctions on Iran beyond the U.N. resolutions, says it is focusing on diplomatic pressure to thwart Tehran&apos;s nuclear plans but has not ruled out military action as a last resort.

On Friday, The New York Times quoted U.S. officials as saying Israel had carried out a large military exercise, apparently a rehearsal for a potential bombing of Iran&apos;s nuclear facilities.

(Reporting by Parisa Hafezi; Additional reporting by Jerusalem bureau; Writing by Fredrik Dahl; Editing by Elizabeth Piper)</description>
         <link>http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2008/06/iran-says-eu-sanctions-could-hurt-nuclear-diplomac.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2008/06/iran-says-eu-sanctions-could-hurt-nuclear-diplomac.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Terror Watch</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Today&apos;s Top News</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">World News</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 06:03:43 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Dobson accuses Obama of `distorting&apos; Bible</title>
         <description>COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. (AP) - As Barack Obama broadens his outreach to evangelical voters, one of the movement&apos;s biggest names, James Dobson, accuses the likely Democratic presidential nominee of distorting the Bible and pushing a &quot;fruitcake interpretation&quot; of the Constitution.

The criticism, to be aired Tuesday on Dobson&apos;s Focus on the Family radio program, comes shortly after an Obama aide suggested a meeting at the organization&apos;s headquarters here, said Tom Minnery, senior vice president for government and public policy at Focus on the Family.

The conservative Christian group provided The Associated Press with an advance copy of the pre-taped radio segment, which runs 18 minutes and highlights excerpts of a speech Obama gave in June 2006 to the liberal Christian group Call to Renewal. Obama mentions Dobson in the speech.

&quot;Even if we did have only Christians in our midst, if we expelled every non-Christian from the United States of America, whose Christianity would we teach in the schools?&quot; Obama said. &quot;Would we go with James Dobson&apos;s or Al Sharpton&apos;s?&quot; referring to the civil rights leader.

Dobson took aim at examples Obama cited in asking which Biblical passages should guide public policy - chapters like Leviticus, which Obama said suggests slavery is OK and eating shellfish is an abomination, or Jesus&apos; Sermon on the Mount, &quot;a passage that is so radical that it&apos;s doubtful that our own Defense Department would survive its application.&quot;

&quot;Folks haven&apos;t been reading their Bibles,&quot; Obama said.

Dobson and Minnery accused Obama of wrongly equating Old Testament texts and dietary codes that no longer apply to Jesus&apos; teachings in the New Testament.

&quot;I think he&apos;s deliberately distorting the traditional understanding of the Bible to fit his own worldview, his own confused theology,&quot; Dobson said.

&quot;... He is dragging biblical understanding through the gutter.&quot;

Joshua DuBois, director of religious affairs for Obama&apos;s campaign, said in a statement that a full reading of Obama&apos;s speech shows he is committed to reaching out to people of faith and standing up for families. &quot;Obama is proud to have the support of millions of Americans of faith and looks forward to working across religious lines to bring our country together,&quot; DuBois said.

Dobson reserved some of his harshest criticism for Obama&apos;s argument that the religiously motivated must frame debates over issues like abortion not just in their own religion&apos;s terms but in arguments accessible to all people.

He said Obama, who supports abortion rights, is trying to govern by the &quot;lowest common denominator of morality,&quot; labeling it &quot;a fruitcake interpretation of the Constitution.&quot;

&quot;Am I required in a democracy to conform my efforts in the political arena to his bloody notion of what is right with regard to the lives of tiny babies?&quot; Dobson said. &quot;What he&apos;s trying to say here is unless everybody agrees, we have no right to fight for what we believe.&quot;

The program was paid for by a Focus on the Family affiliate whose donations are taxed, Dobson said, so it&apos;s legal for that group to get more involved in politics.

Last week, DuBois, a former Assemblies of God associate minister, called Minnery for what Minnery described as a cordial discussion. He would not go into detail, but said Dubois offered to visit the ministry in August when the Democratic National Convention is in Denver.

A possible Obama visit was not discussed, but Focus is open to one, Minnery said.

McCain also has not met with Dobson. A McCain campaign staffer offered Dobson a meeting with McCain recently in Denver, Minnery said. Dobson declined because he prefers that candidates visit the Focus on the Family campus to learn more about the organization, Minnery said.

Dobson has not backed off his statement that he could not in good conscience vote for McCain because of concerns over the Arizona senator&apos;s conservative credentials. Dobson has said he will vote in November but has suggested he might not vote for president.

Obama recently met in Chicago with religious leaders, including conservative evangelicals. His campaign also plans thousands of &quot;American Values House Parties,&quot; where participants discuss Obama and religion, as well as a presence on Christian radio and blogs. </description>
         <link>http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2008/06/dobson-accuses-obama-of-distorting-bible.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2008/06/dobson-accuses-obama-of-distorting-bible.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Breaking Story</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Most Popular</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Obama Watch</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Today&apos;s Top News</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 05:59:36 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Other Bill Clinton</title>
         <description>Not all the world hates the United States. Countries that make up the former Soviet empire have a great love of America, thanks to the U.S. commitment to ensuring their freedom and helping them join the EU and NATO. And in sub-Saharan Africa, the U.S.&apos;s approval ratings are even stronger, including countries with mostly Muslim populations. In fact, George W. Bush&apos;s approval ratings on the continent are staggeringly high because of his commitment to AIDS and malaria funding, which has saved millions of lives.

Says who? Says none other than former President Bill Clinton, in a lecture at the legendary Radio City Music Hall in New York on Tuesday.

It wasn&apos;t a night of nonpartisanship, of course. Mr. Clinton railed against global-warming skeptics and those who would drill in the Arctic. He blamed Republican economic policies for growing inequality in the U.S. and compared American society – in which the richest 1% control 42% of the wealth – to South American dictatorships. 

Nonetheless, Mr. Clinton&apos;s tone in general suggested his finger-wagging behavior on the campaign trail does not carry over when speaking in his capacity as elder statesman and philanthropist. Then, he&apos;s all about policy and problem solving. Also missing was any hint of the isolationism and protectionism that were his party&apos;s stock in trade during the recent primary race.

&quot;Divorce from the rest of the world is not an option,&quot; Mr. Clinton said, generating awkward laughs from the audience. He was referring to his own party&apos;s antitrade posturing as much as Mr. Bush&apos;s refusal to sign the Kyoto climate treaty. Though frustratingly silent on Nafta, a signature achievement of his administration that recently was criticized on the campaign trail by another candidate named Clinton, Mr. Clinton did speak at length about the African Growth and Opportunity Act. 

That law, which he signed in 2000, allows certain sub-Saharan countries – those that improve their labor laws and move toward a market-based economy – to export goods to America duty-free. The act, says Mr. Clinton, created hundreds of thousands of jobs and lifted hundreds of thousands of African families out of dire poverty. Hmmm. If free trade works for Africans, is Mr. Clinton saying it can work for others?</description>
         <link>http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2008/06/the-other-bill-clinton.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2008/06/the-other-bill-clinton.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Editorials</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Politics</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Today&apos;s Top News</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 08:04:01 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Leaked Israeli drill seen as U.S. pressure on Iran</title>
         <description>JERUSALEM (Reuters) - A U.S. leak of an Israeli air exercise reported to be practice for possible bombing of Iran&apos;s nuclear sites was seen in Israel on Sunday as a deliberate move to increase pressure on Tehran to halt sensitive atomic work.

&quot;When the diplomacy of economic and political pressure fails to produce results, a shift is made to gunboat diplomacy,&quot; wrote Alex Fishman, military affairs correspondent of Israel&apos;s biggest newspaper, Yedioth Ahronoth.

&quot;As the Iranian regime discusses the European Union representative&apos;s most recent offer to halt its nuclear program in exchange for extensive benefits, the Americans opted to add a bit more pressure in the shape of Israel&apos;s air force,&quot; he said.

Citing unidentified Pentagon sources, the New York Times said on Friday more than 100 Israeli F-16 and F-15 jets took part in a long-range Mediterranean exercise this month that appeared to be a rehearsal for real missions over Iran.

Israel did not confirm the reported exercise had taken place. But officials said such drills have been commonplace at least since 2005.

Commentator Amir Rappaport, writing in Israel&apos;s Maariv daily, said it was likely the Pentagon leak was an attempt &quot;to deter Iran and increase pressure on it to cooperate&quot; with international nuclear watchdogs.

Earlier this month, European Union foreign policy chief Javier Solana went to Tehran to deliver a revised offer of economic and political incentives from the United States, Britain, France, Germany, Russia and China for Iran to stop pursuing technology that could yield atomic bombs.

Iran has made clear it does not plan to stop a uranium enrichment program which it says is aimed at fueling power plants.

ATTACK

Israeli Transport Minister Shaul Mofaz, a former defense chief, told Yedioth several weeks ago that &quot;if Iran continues with its program for developing nuclear weapons, we will attack it&quot;.

Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, stopping short of an explicit threat to strike Iran, has called for &quot;all possible means&quot; to be used to stop its nuclear activities.

An analysis in Israel&apos;s Haaretz newspaper said the Olmert government viewed an attack on Iran as a last resort and would not strike without first coordinating its actions with the United States.

&quot;Another variable is international sanctions on Iran. These are being applied sluggishly,&quot; Haaretz&apos;s Yossi Melman wrote. &quot;But Israel still has not given up hope that Moscow and Beijing will change their policies and impose harsher sanctions.&quot;

Israel, which is believed to have the region&apos;s only atomic arsenal, bombed Iraq&apos;s nuclear reactor at Osiraq in 1981. Last September, it mounted a similar raid against a Syrian site that the United States described as a secret reactor built with North Korean help -- a charge denied by Damascus.

Sam Gardiner, a retired U.S. air force colonel who now stages wargames for various government agencies in Washington, said Iran&apos;s nuclear facilities were too distant, numerous and fortified for Israel to tackle unilaterally.

&quot;The United States thinks in terms of around 1,000 &apos;aim points&apos; while an Israeli strike would be against around 100 &apos;aim points,&apos;&quot; he said, adding that such a mission would be &quot;disruptive&quot; rather than &quot;destructive&quot;.

(Additional reporting by Dan Williams, Editing by Dominic Evans)
</description>
         <link>http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2008/06/leaked-israeli-drill-seen-as-us-pressure-on-iran.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2008/06/leaked-israeli-drill-seen-as-us-pressure-on-iran.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Most Popular</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Today&apos;s Top News</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">World News</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 07:51:04 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Obama in fundraising free fall</title>
         <description>Democrat Barack Obama raised $22 million in May for his presidential campaign, his weakest fundraising month this year, and ended the month with $43 million cash on hand, while former rival Hillary Rodham Clinton sank deeper in debt.

Obama, who has been the fundraising leader throughout the presidential contest, entered June on virtually the same financial footing as Republican rival John McCain — a level of parity that would have been unimaginable just a few months ago.

Details of the candidates&apos; May fundraising, filed Friday in reports to the Federal Election Commission, came a day after Obama announced he would become the first major party candidate to forgo public financing in the general election. McCain has said he will accept the public funds, which will limit him to spending about $85 million from September until Election Day in November.

McCain raised $21 million in May and ended the month with $31.6 million in the bank. Of Obama&apos;s cash on hand, $10 million is available only for the general election, leaving him with about $33 million to use between now and the party conventions in late summer. Obama reported debts of $304,000; McCain had debts of $1.3 million.

Obama&apos;s decision to forgo public funds permits him to use leftover primary money in the general election. McCain cannot.

Clinton, who bowed out of the Democratic contest on June 7, reported a $22.5 million debt at the end of May, more than half of which came from personal loans to her presidential campaign. The former first lady lent her campaign nearly $2.2 million during the month, bringing her total personal investment in the campaign to $12.175 million. She had $3.4 million cash on hand left for primary
spending. She also had more than $23 million for the general election, money her campaign cannot use to pay off her debts.

Clinton campaigned actively through the last Democratic primaries on June 3 before succumbing to Obama and is expected to have even greater debt at the end of this month. In a call to
donors on Thursday, she said she would concentrate on paying off money owed to vendors, not her personal loans.

Obama reported spending $26.6 million in May. His heaviest spending was on advertising — he spent more than $4 million buying time for television commercials. Clinton reported total disbursements of $19.2 million for the month.

The two Democrats traded primary victories during the month but Obama continued to build his delegate advantage. He secured the nomination June 3, winning that day&apos;s Montana primary but losing to Clinton in South Dakota.

Obama&apos;s decision to forgo public money in the general election gives greater significance to his efforts to capitalize on Clinton&apos;s support for the general election. Her donors would be a
rich vein to tap.

First, however, Clinton needs substantial help retiring her debt. Many of her loyal donors have already contributed the maximum to her campaign, so she needs some new sources of money. That&apos;s
where Obama comes in — his donors help her out, her donors help him.

&quot;It&apos;s far more productive for Obama to have Hillary 100 percent focused and engaged on campaigning and raising money for him in the fall rather than having to do fundraisers at the same time to
retire her debt,&quot; said Hassan Nemazee, a Clinton national finance chairman.

&quot;It would clearly make life easier for those of us in the Clinton world who would like to help Senator Obama raise the types of moneys that are necessary from the Clinton world to be in a position to point out, &apos;Look what Senator Obama has done for Senator Clinton.&quot;&apos;

Clinton and Obama will meet with her top fundraisers next Thursday in Washington, then both will campaign together Friday.

Obama said he is expecting McCain to have significant help from the Republican Party and from outside groups.

So far, though, few conservative outside groups have stepped into the presidential election and those that have have spent little money. In a news conference Friday, Obama defended his decision to go outside the public financing system.

&quot;There are a lot of outside groups that are potentially going to be going after us hard,&quot; he said. He also pointed out that McCain advisers have made a point of featuring the RNC&apos;s financial advantage.

&quot;So you know, this isn&apos;t speculative on my part,&quot; he said. &quot;I think it&apos;s something that we&apos;ve seen in the past and it&apos;s something that we continue to be concerned about.&quot;</description>
         <link>http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2008/06/obama-in-fundraising-free-fall.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2008/06/obama-in-fundraising-free-fall.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">2008 Election Newstracker...</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Most Popular</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Obama Watch</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Politics</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Today&apos;s Top News</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 07:49:30 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Oil minister: Saudi Arabia willing to increase oil production if customers request it</title>
         <description>JIDDAH, Saudi Arabia (AP) -- Saudi Arabia is willing to produce more oil if customers need it, the kingdom&apos;s oil minister said Sunday without citing any specific output increase.

Saudi Arabia, the world&apos;s largest oil exporter, has been under intense pressure from the U.S. and other oil consumers to increase its crude output to help slow the soaring price of oil.

The kingdom already announced modest increases and said it would pump 9.7 million barrels a day beginning in July. But those increases have not done much to stem the skyrocketing price of oil, which closed near $135 a barrel on Friday.

The high prices are affecting consumers and economies across the United States, Europe and much of the world. Many countries have experienced social unrest as rising fuel prices have driven significant increases in the cost of food and other basic goods.

The cost of gasoline has also become a sore point in the U.S. presidential race, with U.S. President George W. Bush and Republican candidate John McCain calling for lifting of a long-standing ban on offshore oil and gas drilling to increase domestic oil production. But Democratic candidate Barack Obama has said such steps will do nothing in the short term to ease American consumer&apos;s pain.

It was unclear if Oil Minister Ali al-Naimi&apos;s remarks Sunday at a high-level oil summit in the port city of Jiddah would quell concerns.

Al-Naimi, who was expected to formally make the announcements in a speech later Sunday, reiterated his government&apos;s position that the recent run-up in prices has not been caused by a supply shortage. But he said he also believes each country must do what it can &quot;to alleviate these difficult conditions.&quot;

For the remainder of the year &quot;Saudi Arabia is willing to produce additional barrels of crude oil above and beyond the 9.7 million barrels per day which we plan to produce during the month of July, if demand for such quantities materializes and our customers tell us they are needed,&quot; al-Naimi said in the speech, a copy of which was obtained by The Associated Press in advance.

Al-Naimi also said that the kingdom was willing to invest to boost its spare oil production capacity above the current 12.5 million barrels per day planned for the end of 2009, reversing previous statements that the country would not go beyond that figure.

&quot;In addition, we have identified a series of future crude oil mega-increments totaling another 2.5 million barrels per day of capacity that could be built if and when crude oil demand levels warrant their development,&quot; he said.

The U.S. and other Western nations have put increasing pressure on Saudi Arabia to increase production, saying insufficient oil production has not kept pace with growing demand.

Earlier Sunday, King Abdullah also said Saudi Arabia was not to blame for soaring oil prices and instead pointed his finger at speculators, high fuel taxes in consuming countries and increased oil consumption in developing economies.

&quot;There are several factors behind the unjustified, swift rise in oil prices and they are: Speculators who play the market out of selfish interests, increased consumption by several developing economies and additional taxes on oil in several consuming countries,&quot; the king said.

Abdullah urged the summit&apos;s delegates to &quot;uncover the truth&quot; and dispel rumors to get the &quot;real and full reasons&quot; behind the skyrocketing price of oil.

Saudi Arabia increased oil production by 300,000 barrels a day in May, and a Saudi official confirmed Saturday that the country would add another 200,000 barrels a day in July -- for a total of 9.7 million barrels a day.

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown also called for future commitments from producers for increased oil and gas supply but urged that all countries should improve energy efficiency and develop alternative sources of energy, including nuclear power.

Earlier Sunday, U.S. Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman again called on Saudi Arabia to increase production, saying it has not kept pace with growing demand.

Bodman said world oil consumption growth has averaged about 1.8 percent per year since 2003 with the largest share of that growth coming from developing countries like China, India and countries in the Middle East, he said.

But for the past three years, global oil production has remained constant at roughly 85 million barrels a day, and OPEC production has remained largely flat, he said in a written statement.

&quot;I believe that most of us agree on one thing: Prices are too high at present. And unless we act, the situation will remain unsustainable,&quot; he said in the statement.

The kingdom called for Sunday&apos;s unusual meeting in Jiddah between oil producing and consuming nations as a way to show that it was not deaf to international cries that high oil prices have caused social and economic turmoil.

The Gulf nation also has become increasingly concerned that record oil prices could hinder growth in the U.S. and other major industrialized economies, potentially leading to a decline in oil demand and a sharp drop-off in prices.

Also Sunday, Abdullah called for the creation of a $1 billion energy initiative for poor countries to help them combat the rising cost of fuel. He also said Saudi Arabia would contribute $500 million to help give poor countries loans to finance development and energy projects.

Associated Press Writer Donna Abu Nasr contributed to this report.

</description>
         <link>http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2008/06/oil-minister-saudi-arabia-willing-to-increase-oil.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2008/06/oil-minister-saudi-arabia-willing-to-increase-oil.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Business</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Today&apos;s Top News</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">World News</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 07:42:21 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Iran presses on with nuclear enrichment &quot;non-stop&quot;</title>
         <description>TEHRAN (Reuters) - Iran is pressing on with uranium enrichment &quot;non-stop&quot;, its envoy to the U.N. nuclear agency was quoted as saying on Saturday, despite a world powers&apos; offer of economic incentives to coax Tehran into halting such activities.

The Islamic Republic also appeared to dismiss any suggestion of limiting nuclear work it says is for generating electricity but which the West suspects is aimed at making bombs.

Six major powers, including the United States, last week offered Iran help in developing a civilian nuclear program and other benefits in their latest attempt to resolve a long-running dispute that has helped pushed oil prices to record highs.

Iran&apos;s chief nuclear negotiator said Tehran was ready to start negotiations &quot;based on a win-win principle&quot;, official media said. Saeed Jalili was also quoted as saying such talks represented a &quot;golden opportunity&quot; to strengthen peace.

But Iran &quot;will not bow to any illogical demands that would deprive it of its rights to continue with its peaceful nuclear activities&quot;, he said.

The United States says it is focusing on diplomatic pressure to thwart Tehran&apos;s nuclear ambitions but has not ruled out military action as a last resort.

The New York Times on Friday quoted U.S. officials as saying Israel had carried out a large military exercise, apparently a rehearsal for a potential bombing of Iran&apos;s nuclear facilities.

The U.N. nuclear watchdog chief, Mohamad ElBaradei, the same day warned a military strike on Iran would turn the Middle East into a fireball.

Iranian government spokesman Gholamhossein Elham, when asked about the report on Saturday, branded Israel a &quot;dangerous regime&quot; but made clear his view that it would not dare attack.

&quot;Such insolence and audacity (against Iran&apos;s) interest and territorial integrity is an impossible act,&quot; Elham said.

Diplomats said on Friday the six powers had offered Iran preliminary talks on its nuclear program, on condition it limit enrichment to current levels for six weeks in exchange for a freeze on moves towards harsher sanctions.

They said European Union foreign policy chief Javier Solana conveyed the proposal during talks in Tehran on June 14 in which he presented a revised batch of incentives for Iran to stop pursuing technology that could yield atomic weapons.

&quot;FREEZE-FOR-FREEZE&quot;

Asked whether such a &quot;freeze-for-freeze&quot; proposal would be acceptable to Iran, Elham told reporters:

&quot;About suspension, it has been said that suspension of activities and suspension of enrichment is not a logical issue that would be acceptable and in any case the continuation of negotiations will not be based on enrichment suspension.&quot;

Iran has repeatedly rejected the sextet&apos;s precondition of a full suspension of enrichment-related activity before negotiations to implement the incentives.

Iran says it will review the offer by the United States, Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany but that it will not stop work which can have both civilian and military uses.

Its refusal to do so has drawn three rounds of limited United Nations sanctions since 2006.

&quot;The Islamic Republic of Iran continues with enrichment non-stop,&quot; Ali Asghar Soltanieh, Tehran&apos;s envoy to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), told Iran&apos;s state broadcaster in an interview.

Iran, the world&apos;s fourth-largest oil producer, has steadily expanded enrichment capacity to 3,600 centrifuge machines.

Asked why Iran would need additional centrifuges, Jalili said: &quot;We would need at least 50,000 centrifuges for a small sized power station.&quot;

Under the &quot;freeze-for-freeze&quot; proposal, Iran would not expand enrichment capacity by adding centrifuge machines for a six-week period, during which the powers would stop moves to sharpen the mild sanctions already in force, the diplomats said.

The interim period would enable &quot;pre-negotiations&quot; to agree parameters for formal negotiations to put the incentives into effect, once Iran has fully suspended enrichment, they said.

(Writing by Fredrik Dahl; Editing by Richard Balmforth)
</description>
         <link>http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2008/06/iran-presses-on-with-nuclear-enrichment-nonstop.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2008/06/iran-presses-on-with-nuclear-enrichment-nonstop.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Fade in / Fade out</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Terror Watch</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Today&apos;s Top News</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">World News</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 07:38:24 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Mugabe&apos;s rival Tsvangirai pulls out of election</title>
         <description>HARARE (Reuters) - Zimbabwean opposition leader Morgan Tsvangirai pulled out of a run-off election against President Robert Mugabe on Sunday, saying a free and fair poll was impossible in the current climate of violence.

Speaking only hours after his opposition Movement for Democratic Change reported its rally had been broken up by pro-Mugabe youth militia, Tsvangirai called on the United Nations and the African Union to intervene to stop &quot;genocide&quot; in the former British colony.

&quot;We in the MDC have resolved that we will no longer participate in this violent, illegitimate sham of an election process,&quot; he told reporters in Harare.

The MDC and Tsvangirai, who beat Mugabe in a March 29 vote but failed to win the absolute majority needed to avoid a second ballot, have repeatedly accused government security forces and militia of intimidation and strong-arm tactics to ensure a Mugabe victory in the June 27 poll.

Tsvangirai repeated this on Sunday, saying there was a state-sponsored plot to keep the 84-year-old Mugabe in power.

&quot;We in the MDC cannot ask them (the voters) to cast their vote on June 27, when that vote could cost them their lives,&quot; he said.

Tsvangirai, who himself had been detained by police five times while campaigning, said 86 MDC supporters had been killed and 200,000 displaced from their homes.

Mugabe has repeatedly vowed never to turn over power to the opposition, which he brands a puppet of Britain and the United States.

Mugabe, who has ruled since independence from Britain in 1980, has blamed the political violence on the opposition and denies security forces have been responsible for brutal actions.

The veteran leader has presided over a ruinous slide in a once prosperous economy. Millions have fled the political and economic crisis to neighboring states.

The MDC earlier said that thousands of youth militia loyal to Mugabe poured into an MDC rally in Harare on Sunday armed with iron bars and sticks, beating journalists and forcing election observers to flee.

Police had banned the rally, which was to be the highlight of Tsvangirai&apos;s stormy election campaign, but a high court in Harare overturned the police ban on Saturday.

INTERNATIONAL PRESSURE

Tsvangirai said he won the March vote outright and only reluctantly agreed to a run-off. The state-run media has refused to run the opposition&apos;s political ads and police have blocked some of its rallies.

Tendai Biti, a top MDC official and lieutenant to Tsvangirai, is in custody on a treason charge and other offences that carry a possible death penalty. A magistrate has ordered him held until at least July 7.

There is, however, pressure on Mugabe&apos;s government to put an end to the violence.

A growing chorus of African leaders added their voices to concerns that the election will be illegitimate.

Angolan President Jose Eduardo dos Santos, a longtime Mugabe ally, on Friday urged the Zimbabwean leader to allow the election to proceed in a spirit of tolerance and with respect to democratic norms.

(Writing by Paul Simao; Editing by Richard Balmforth)</description>
         <link>http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2008/06/mugabes-rival-tsvangirai-pulls-out-of-election.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2008/06/mugabes-rival-tsvangirai-pulls-out-of-election.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Most Popular</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Politics</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Today&apos;s Top News</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">World News</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 07:33:06 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>